Not possible, given the nature of the interventionīlinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)Īll participants entered into the study had follow‐up dataīoth groups of participants placed on Thumper back‐board. Quasi‐randomisation did not allow for allocation concealmentīlinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Quasi‐randomisation based on odd/even days Random sequence generation (selection bias) Reporting of baseline characteristics limited to initial rhythm Primary outcome of study was end‐tidal carbon dioxide. ![]() Survival to hospital admission: mechanical 1/7 (14.2%), manual 0/10 (0%) Compression rate: audio prompt for 80/min Compression/ventilation ratio: not reported Compression/ventilation ratio: not reported ![]() Mechanical: "Thumper" piston at 80 compressions/min. ![]() Hypothermia treatment post‐arrest: not reported ![]() Randomisation based on odd/even calendar daysĪdults with out‐of‐hospital, atraumatic cardiac arrest with resuscitation attempted by paramedics
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |